Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Z915
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Released January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Casio EX-ZR10 and Kodak Z915, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the Z915 (10MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR10 was released 21 months after the Z915 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR10 scores against the Z915 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Kodak EasyShare Z915. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Kodak Z915
| EX-ZR10 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 21 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| Z915 | EX-ZR10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Kodak Z915
| EX-ZR10 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR10 has got outer dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Kodak Z915 has proportions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR10 and Kodak Z915 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR10 vs the Z915.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and Z915 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR10 and Z915.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR10 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR10 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $190 | $200 |