Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced September 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and Easyshare M5370 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR10 was unveiled 11 months prior to the Easyshare M5370 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR10 matches up against the Easyshare M5370 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Kodak Easyshare M5370. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| EX-ZR10 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| Easyshare M5370 | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2011 | September 2010 | More recent by 11 months | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Kodak Easyshare M5370
| EX-ZR10 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR10 comes with physical dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR10 vs the Easyshare M5370.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and Easyshare M5370 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR10 and Easyshare M5370.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to render greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2011-09-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-1, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 pounds) | 150 grams (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $190 | $160 |