Casio EX-ZR10 vs Nikon S9900
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9700
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR10 vs Nikon S9900 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Nikon S9900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Nikon. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and S9900 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR10 was brought out 5 years before the S9900 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-ZR10 grades versus the S9900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR10 vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Nikon Coolpix S9900. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Nikon S9900
| EX-ZR10 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| S9900 | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 | September 2010 | More recent by 53 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 461k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Nikon S9900
| EX-ZR10 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR10 offers physical measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Nikon S9900 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Nikon S9900 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR10 versus the S9900.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and S9900 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and S9900.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Nikon S9900 to provide you with greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 289 grams (0.64 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $190 | $300 |