Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 6020
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35


95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 6020, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR10 was manufactured 8 months later than the 6020 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR10 matches up against the 6020 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Olympus 6020
EX-ZR10 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2010 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 8 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Casio EX-ZR10
6020 | EX-ZR10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus 6020
EX-ZR10 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR10 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR10 against the 6020.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and 6020 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking specs. The visual below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR10 and 6020.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus 6020 to give greater detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR10 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 122g (0.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-110 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $190 | $279 |