Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VH-515
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Olympus VH-515, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the VH-515 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR10 was launched 23 months earlier than the VH-515 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR10 grades versus the VH-515 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Olympus VH-515. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Olympus VH-515
| EX-ZR10 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| VH-515 | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2012 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 23 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus VH-515
| EX-ZR10 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR10 provides physical measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-515 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Olympus VH-515 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR10 vs the VH-515.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and VH-515 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The graphic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR10 and VH-515.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of files though you would want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus VH-515 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus VH-515 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 152 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $190 | $648 |