Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-340
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR10 was launched 15 months earlier than the VR-340 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR10 matches up versus the VR-340 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Olympus VR-340. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Olympus VR-340
EX-ZR10 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Casio EX-ZR10
VR-340 | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | September 2010 | More recent by 15 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus VR-340
EX-ZR10 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR10 features outer dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Olympus VR-340 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR10 and the VR-340.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and VR-340 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR10 and VR-340.
Clearly, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-340 to show greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus VR-340 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.7 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-110 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $190 | $130 |