Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very well matched but the EX-ZR10 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR10 was released 3 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZR10 scores against the XZ-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-ZR10 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR10
| XZ-2 iHS | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 27 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-ZR10 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR10 features exterior dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR10 vs the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and XZ-2 iHS is 93 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The graphic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR10 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have the same resolution but different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR10 contains the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field tougher. The older EX-ZR10 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 346 grams (0.76 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $190 | $450 |