Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GR
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Lets look closer at the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the EX-ZR10 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR10 was revealed 3 years earlier than the GR and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-ZR10 scores versus the GR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Ricoh GR. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Ricoh GR
EX-ZR10 | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-ZR10
GR | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2013 | September 2010 | More recent by 31 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 461k | Crisper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh GR
EX-ZR10 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR10 features external measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR10 versus the GR.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and GR is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and GR.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR10 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GR will produce greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh GR |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-09-20 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 300s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $190 | $971 |