Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR10 was revealed 4 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR10 scores versus the WG-4 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-ZR10 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-ZR10
| WG-4 GPS | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | September 2010 | More recent by 41 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-ZR10 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR10 features outside measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR10 versus the WG-4 GPS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR10 and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading specs. The visual underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to offer greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 lbs) | 235g (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $190 | $210 |