Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-6
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-6, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR10 was brought out 8 years prior to the WG-6 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR10 matches up against the WG-6 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Ricoh WG-6. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Ricoh WG-6
| EX-ZR10 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| WG-6 | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2018 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 90 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+579k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-6
| EX-ZR10 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR10 enjoys outer measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-6 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-6 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR10 vs the WG-6.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and WG-6 is 93 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The visual below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and WG-6.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-6 to show extra detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 246 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $190 | $271 |