Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-M1
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very close and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR10 was introduced 5 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-ZR10 scores against the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-ZR10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| WG-M1 | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | September 2010 | More modern by 48 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-ZR10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR10 features outer measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR10 against the WG-M1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and WG-M1 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and WG-M1.
Clearly, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-M1 to render greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 1.5" |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $190 | $2,000 |