Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL5
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL10
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL5, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the EX-ZR10 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") use totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR10 was manufactured 20 months later than the CL5 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-ZR10 scores vs the CL5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Samsung CL5. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung CL5
| EX-ZR10 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 20 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| CL5 | EX-ZR10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung CL5
| EX-ZR10 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR10 enjoys outer dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL5 has proportions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR10 against the CL5.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and CL5 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading through specs. The photograph here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR10 and CL5.
All in all, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR10 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Casio EX-ZR10 will give extra detail due to its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR10 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung CL5 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 141g (0.31 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $190 | $391 |