Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL80
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35


95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is ST5500

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung CL80, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR10 was released 9 months after the CL80 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-ZR10 scores vs the CL80 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Samsung CL80. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung CL80
EX-ZR10 | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2010 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 9 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Casio EX-ZR10
CL80 | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.7" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung CL80
EX-ZR10 | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR10 comes with outside dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL80 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung CL80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR10 versus the CL80.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR10 and CL80 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading through a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR10 and CL80.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung CL80 to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR10 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung CL80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung CL80 |
Also called | - | ST5500 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3.7" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-110 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $190 | $400 |