Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung GX-1S
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung GX-1S, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the EX-ZR10 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR10 was released 4 years after the GX-1S which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-ZR10 grades against the GX-1S when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Samsung GX-1S. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung GX-1S
| EX-ZR10 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2010 | January 2006 | More modern by 57 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 210k | Crisper screen (+251k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Casio EX-ZR10
| GX-1S | EX-ZR10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung GX-1S
| EX-ZR10 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR10 comes with physical dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung GX-1S has dimensions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung GX-1S in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR10 against the GX-1S.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and GX-1S is 93 and 68 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The pic here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR10 and GX-1S.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR10 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Casio EX-ZR10 will give you more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR10 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung GX-1S |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2006-01-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 6MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 pounds) | 605g (1.33 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $190 | $850 |