Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR10/Casio-EX-ZR10-front.jpg)
![Samsung NX200 front Samsung NX200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-NX200.jpg)
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched February 2012
- Replaced the Samsung NX100
- Renewed by Samsung NX210
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung NX200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the EX-ZR10 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR10 was revealed 17 months earlier than the NX200 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-ZR10 matches up vs the NX200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Samsung NX200. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung NX200
EX-ZR10 | NX200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Casio EX-ZR10
NX200 | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | ![]() | September 2010 | Newer by 17 months |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper display (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung NX200
EX-ZR10 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR10 enjoys exterior measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX200 has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung NX200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR10 against the NX200.
![Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 size comparison Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR10-vs-Samsung-NX200-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and NX200 is 93 and 90 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR10-vs-Samsung-NX200-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR10 and NX200.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR10 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung NX200 will show extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR10 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR10-vs-Samsung-NX200-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR10-vs-Samsung-NX200-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung NX200 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 pounds) | 223 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $190 | $818 |