Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung PL200
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced July 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung PL200, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is very comparable and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR10 was announced 3 months after the PL200 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR10 grades against the PL200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Samsung PL200. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung PL200
| EX-ZR10 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| PL200 | EX-ZR10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung PL200
| EX-ZR10 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 |  | July 2010 | Same generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR10 offers outside measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung PL200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR10 compared to the PL200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR10 and PL200 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR10 and PL200.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung PL200 to provide more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung PL200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2010-07-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 170 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $190 | $0 |
