Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL102
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR10 was revealed 21 months later than the SL102 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-ZR10 matches up vs the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Samsung SL102. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-ZR10 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 21 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| SL102 | EX-ZR10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung SL102
| EX-ZR10 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR10 comes with exterior measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR10 vs the SL102.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and SL102 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and SL102.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR10 to offer greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR10 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 gr (0.39 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $190 | $130 |