Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL202
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also Known as PL50
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR10 was released 20 months later than the SL202 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR10 grades against the SL202 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung SL202
| EX-ZR10 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2010 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 20 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| SL202 | EX-ZR10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung SL202
| EX-ZR10 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR10 comes with exterior measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR10 and the SL202.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and SL202 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and SL202.
As you can tell, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR10 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR10 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $190 | $140 |