Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL205
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as PL100
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung TL205, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the TL205 (12MP) is relatively comparable and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR10 was launched 9 months later than the TL205 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-ZR10 matches up versus the TL205 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Samsung TL205. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung TL205
EX-ZR10 | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2010 | January 2010 | More recent by 9 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Casio EX-ZR10
TL205 | EX-ZR10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung TL205
EX-ZR10 | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR10 has external dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL205 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung TL205 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR10 versus the TL205.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and TL205 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The visual below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR10 and TL205.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP and you can expect comparable quality of images though you have to take the age of the cameras into account. The more modern EX-ZR10 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung TL205 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung TL205 |
Also referred to as | - | PL100 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-09-20 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 177 grams (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $190 | $180 |