Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB210
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB210, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR10 was introduced 10 months prior to the WB210 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR10 scores versus the WB210 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-ZR10 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 1k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| WB210 | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 10 months |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB210
| EX-ZR10 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR10 offers exterior dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB210 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR10 against the WB210.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and WB210 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The visual here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR10 and WB210.
As you have seen, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB210 to show greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung WB210 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 1k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 pounds) | 174 grams (0.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $190 | $279 |