Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB350F
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB350F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR10 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WB350F which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR10 grades against the WB350F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung WB350F
EX-ZR10 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-ZR10
WB350F | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | September 2010 | Newer by 40 months | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB350F
EX-ZR10 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR10 offers outer dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR10 vs the WB350F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR10 and WB350F is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The image below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR10 and WB350F.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB350F to offer you greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung WB350F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 lbs) | 276g (0.61 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-110 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $190 | $260 |