Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB800F
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB800F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR10 was brought out 3 years earlier than the WB800F and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-ZR10 matches up versus the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZR10 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-ZR10
| WB800F | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | September 2010 | Fresher by 28 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZR10 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR10 comes with external measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR10 against the WB800F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR10 and WB800F is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing only by going over specifications. The photograph underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and WB800F.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB800F to offer more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $190 | $300 |