Clicky

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
35
Overall
35
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
  • Introduced September 2010
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Lets examine more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-ZR10 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-ZR10 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZR10 matches up versus the DP2 Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-ZR10 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-ZR10

 DP2 Quattro EX-ZR10 
IntroducedFebruary 2014September 2010More modern by 41 months
Display resolution920k461kCrisper display (+459k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-ZR10 DP2 Quattro 
Focus manually More exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR10 comes with outside dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR10 and the DP2 Quattro.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and DP2 Quattro is 93 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching specifications. The image below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR10 and DP2 Quattro.

Plainly, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR10 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will result in extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR10 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR10
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
27
focusing manually
no manual control
external flash not possible
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
77
focusing manually
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
has face detection focus
saves RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR10 as a Street photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
56
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
61
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR10 Sports photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography information
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
48
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR10 Travel photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography factors
57
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
low MP (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
53
MP count good (20MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR10 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
41
focusing manually
quite wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
59
focusing manually
good sized screen (3 inches)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR10 Vlogging features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging features
32
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic jack
9
no video
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR10Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Sigma
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-09-20 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS TRUE III engine
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-196mm (7.0x) 45mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 461 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 176g (0.39 lb) 395g (0.87 lb)
Dimensions 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-110 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $190 $931