Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Launched April 2012
- Succeeded the Sigma SD1
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR10 and Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty similar but the EX-ZR10 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR10 was launched 18 months earlier than the SD1 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR10 matches up versus the SD1 Merrill in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-ZR10 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Casio EX-ZR10
SD1 Merrill | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2012 | September 2010 | More recent by 18 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-ZR10 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR10 has external measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has specifications of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR10 and Sigma SD1 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR10 vs the SD1 Merrill.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and SD1 Merrill is 93 and 57 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The graphic below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and SD1 Merrill.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR10 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Dual True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 790g (1.74 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $190 | $2,339 |