Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD9
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Refreshed by Sigma SD10
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Sigma SD9, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the EX-ZR10 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR10 was announced 7 years after the SD9 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR10 grades vs the SD9 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Sigma SD9. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Sigma SD9
EX-ZR10 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2010 | November 2002 | More modern by 96 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 130k | Sharper screen (+331k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Casio EX-ZR10
SD9 | EX-ZR10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Sigma SD9
EX-ZR10 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR10 provides exterior dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Sigma SD9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR10 compared to the SD9.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and SD9 is 93 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR10 and SD9.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR10 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Casio EX-ZR10 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR10 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Sigma SD9 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 130k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 950 grams (2.09 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $190 | $3,001 |