Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm T200
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm T200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix T205
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm T200 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm T200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the T200 (14MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR100 was manufactured 7 months after the T200 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR100 matches up versus the T200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm T200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and FujiFilm FinePix T200. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and FujiFilm T200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the FujiFilm T200
| EX-ZR100 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| T200 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and FujiFilm T200
| EX-ZR100 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm T200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR100 has outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm T200 has proportions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm T200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR100 and the T200.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and T200 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm T200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR100 and T200.
Clearly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the FujiFilm T200 to result in more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR100 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm T200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm T200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | FujiFilm FinePix T200 |
| Also called as | - | FinePix T205 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.4-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204 grams (0.45 pounds) | 151 grams (0.33 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 180 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $160 |