Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR100.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare Sport front Kodak EasyShare Sport front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport/Kodak-Sport-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Casio EX-ZR100 and Kodak Sport, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the Sport (12MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR100 was revealed 7 months after the Sport and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR100 matches up versus the Sport in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Kodak EasyShare Sport. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Kodak Sport Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Kodak Sport
EX-ZR100 | Sport | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 7 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 112k | Sharper screen (+349k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Casio EX-ZR100
Sport | EX-ZR100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Kodak Sport
EX-ZR100 | Sport | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR100 features outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Kodak Sport has proportions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR100 and Kodak Sport in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the Sport.
![Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport size comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR100-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and Sport is 92 and 92 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR100-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and Sport.
Clearly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution and you should expect comparable quality of files although you should really factor the release date of the cameras into account. The more recent EX-ZR100 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
![Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR100-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR100-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Sport Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Kodak EasyShare Sport | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2011-01-04 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1250 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.4 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 112 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 204 grams (0.45 lbs) | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $300 | $155 |