Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Kodak Z915, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the Z915 (10MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR100 was revealed 2 years after the Z915 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-ZR100 matches up against the Z915 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Kodak EasyShare Z915. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Kodak Z915
| EX-ZR100 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| Z915 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Kodak Z915
| EX-ZR100 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR100 provides exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Kodak Z915 has dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Kodak Z915 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR100 and the Z915.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and Z915 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out specifications. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and Z915.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR100 to produce more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR100 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204 grams (0.45 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $200 |
