Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Kodak Z915, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the Z915 (10MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe EX-ZR100 was revealed 2 years after the Z915 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-ZR100 matches up against the Z915 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Kodak EasyShare Z915. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Kodak Z915
| EX-ZR100 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| Z915 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Kodak Z915
| EX-ZR100 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR100 provides exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Kodak Z915 has dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Kodak Z915 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR100 and the Z915.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and Z915 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out specifications. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and Z915.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR100 to produce more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR100 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204 grams (0.45 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $200 |