Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5010
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
Portability
96 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
96 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5010 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
Olympus FE-5010
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5010 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus FE-5010, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the FE-5010 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR100 was brought out 2 years after the FE-5010 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-ZR100 matches up versus the FE-5010 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5010 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Olympus FE-5010. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Olympus FE-5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus FE-5010
| EX-ZR100 | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| FE-5010 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus FE-5010
| EX-ZR100 | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5010 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR100 has external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus FE-5010 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus FE-5010 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the FE-5010.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and FE-5010 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5010 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The image underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR100 and FE-5010.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution and you should expect similar quality of photographs however you really should take the release date of the products into consideration. The more recent EX-ZR100 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Portrait photography info
Olympus FE-5010 Portrait photography info
has manual focus
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Street photography advice
Olympus FE-5010 Street photography advice
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (204 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than competition in class (130g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Sports photography features
Olympus FE-5010 Sports photography features
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
high fps (40.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no shutter priority
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR100
Travel photography with Olympus FE-5010
lighter than competition in class (204 grams)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
does not have Timelapse function
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition in class (130 grams)
weather proof
built-in flash
no Time Lapse function
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus FE-5010 Landscape photography highlights
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR100
Vlogging with Olympus FE-5010
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (204 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
does not have microphone support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (130 grams)
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus FE-5010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus FE-5010 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2009-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204g (0.45 lbs) | 130g (0.29 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $300 | $130 |
