Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5020
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Other Name is X-935
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus FE-5020, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the FE-5020 (12MP) is pretty close and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR100 was unveiled 2 years after the FE-5020 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR100 scores versus the FE-5020 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Olympus FE-5020. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus FE-5020
| EX-ZR100 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 | July 2009 | Newer by 25 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| FE-5020 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus FE-5020
| EX-ZR100 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR100 offers external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5020 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus FE-5020 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR100 against the FE-5020.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and FE-5020 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR100 and FE-5020.
As you can see, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you will want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The fresher EX-ZR100 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Also called as | - | X-935 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204g (0.45 lbs) | 137g (0.30 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $160 |