Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus Tough-3000
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39


94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is relatively comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR100 was announced 19 months later than the Tough-3000 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-ZR100 matches up against the Tough-3000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus Tough-3000
EX-ZR100 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 19 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Casio EX-ZR100
Tough-3000 | EX-ZR100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus Tough-3000
EX-ZR100 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR100 provides outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR100 against the Tough-3000.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and Tough-3000 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by going through specifications. The photograph here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and Tough-3000.
Plainly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of files but you will want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer EX-ZR100 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 204 gr (0.45 lb) | 159 gr (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $300 | $0 |