Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 6000
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6000
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus 6000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR100 was revealed 2 years after the 6000 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR100 grades vs the 6000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus 6000
| EX-ZR100 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 | July 2009 | Newer by 25 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| 6000 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus 6000
| EX-ZR100 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR100 features external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6000 has specifications of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus 6000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR100 against the 6000.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and 6000 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The pic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR100 and 6000.
Plainly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR100 to give you extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR100 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 6000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 1/4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204 grams (0.45 lb) | 179 grams (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $259 |