Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus TG-310
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus TG-310, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is fairly similar and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR100 was brought out 7 months after the TG-310 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR100 scores against the TG-310 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Olympus TG-310. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus TG-310
| EX-ZR100 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 | January 2011 | Newer by 7 months | |
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| TG-310 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus TG-310
| EX-ZR100 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR100 provides exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus TG-310 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR100 against the TG-310.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and TG-310 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The pic underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and TG-310.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-310 to offer extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR100 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204 grams (0.45 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $0 |