Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus VR-320
Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR100 was announced around the same time to the VR-320 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR100 grades versus the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus VR-320
| EX-ZR100 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| VR-320 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus VR-320
| EX-ZR100 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | July 2011 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR100 comes with exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR100 compared to the VR-320.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and VR-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through specifications. The graphic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR100 and VR-320.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to result in more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
decent MP (14MP)
features face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR100
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (204 grams)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Sports photography info
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography info
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
high fps (40.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Travel photography info
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
lighter than competition in class (204g)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse function
low megapixels (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
no Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Vlogging info
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging info
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (204g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone jack
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than average in class (158g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic support
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204g (0.45 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $179 |