Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very well matched but the EX-ZR100 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR100 was announced 17 months earlier than the XZ-2 iHS making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-ZR100 grades against the XZ-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-ZR100 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR100
| XZ-2 iHS | EX-ZR100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 | July 2011 | More recent by 17 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-ZR100 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR100 has got external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR100 and the XZ-2 iHS.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and XZ-2 iHS is 92 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR100 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide the same megapixels but different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR100 comes with the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF harder. The older EX-ZR100 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204 gr (0.45 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $450 |