Casio EX-ZR100 vs Panasonic FH3
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS11
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR100 vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Panasonic FH3, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Panasonic. The image resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the FH3 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR100 was revealed 19 months after the FH3 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-ZR100 matches up against the FH3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-ZR100 vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Panasonic FH3
| EX-ZR100 | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 19 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| FH3 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Panasonic FH3
| EX-ZR100 | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR100 comes with outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH3 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Panasonic FH3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the FH3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and FH3 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by researching a spec sheet. The pic here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and FH3.
Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Panasonic FH3 to result in more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR100 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Panasonic |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
| Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204g (0.45 lbs) | 165g (0.36 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $300 | $160 |