Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/109d1/109d1949782e31ac5d25697e8a75aabcf5d97273" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13ebc/13ebc3c2793d203ea2398f0aa96e683a4f696bfe" alt="Ricoh GR front Ricoh GR front"
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Renewed by Ricoh GR II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Ricoh GR, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the EX-ZR100 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The EX-ZR100 was brought out 21 months before the GR which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZR100 matches up versus the GR for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Ricoh GR. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Ricoh GR
EX-ZR100 | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-ZR100
GR | EX-ZR100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2013 | ![]() | July 2011 | More recent by 21 months |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Ricoh GR
EX-ZR100 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR100 comes with exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Ricoh GR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the GR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1110/b1110a5adfa127a01b4e9ac43cef6e9af719f73d" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR size comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and GR is 92 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db261/db2612c9f5f762083c85d7d20f783100189cbb81" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by going through technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR100 and GR.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR100 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GR will show extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older EX-ZR100 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96aa8/96aa8bac277b75dbde788a945b81dc5c4858c520" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e484/2e4840f05efec2703fc764cc39524e02b458c490" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Ricoh GR |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2013-04-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 300s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 204 gr (0.45 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $300 | $971 |