Clicky

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR100
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2011
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Launched February 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the EX-ZR100 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-ZR100 was brought out 6 months prior to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR100 grades against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

		

		

			
 EX-ZR100 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-ZR100

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 EX-ZR100 
Screen resolution920k461kClearer screen (+459k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

		

		

			
 EX-ZR100 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
LaunchedJuly 2011February 2012Similar age
Manually focus  More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Selfie screen  No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  No Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR100 comes with exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 92 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR100 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
All in all, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR100 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively.
	
			Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR100
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
29
 focusing manually
 cannot use external flash
 MP count low (12MP)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
74
 you can focus manually
 megapixel count decent (16MP)
 good sensor size (APS-C)
 includes face detection focus
 exports RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Street Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR100 as a Street photography camera
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Street photography camera
61
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition (204 grams)
 screen is fixed
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
55
 good sensor size (APS-C)
 exports RAW files
 screen is fixed
 lack of image stabilization
 heavier than others (550 grams)
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR100
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
46
 incredible zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 high max fps (40.0 frames/s)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides tracking focus
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect autofocus
48
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 good sensor size (APS-C)
 very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
 lack of image stabilization
 no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Travel photography factors
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography factors
63
 lighter than competition (204g)
 has built in flash
 rather wide (24mm)
 very long zoom (300mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
 MP count low (12MP)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
59
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 rather wide (24mm)
 heavier than others (550g)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Landscape photography information
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography information
43
 focusing manually
 rather wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
63
 you can focus manually
 rather wide (24mm)
 screen size is decent (3 inch)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 good sensor size (APS-C)
 exports RAW files
 cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging highlights
33
 rather wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than competition (204 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 doesn't have mic jack
24
 rather wide (24mm)
 includes face detection focus
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 lack of image stabilization
 video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 does not have external mic socket
 heavier than others (550 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	

		

			
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR100 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR100Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Make Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2011-07-19 2012-02-02
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4928 x 3264
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 24-85mm (3.5x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 461k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch function    
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 180s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/3200s
Continuous shooting rate 40.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4
Mic port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 204 grams (0.45 lb) 550 grams (1.21 lb)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 400 photos
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $300 $871