Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-30
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39


91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-30, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR100 was unveiled 4 years before the WG-30 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR100 scores vs the WG-30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Ricoh WG-30. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Ricoh WG-30
EX-ZR100 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio EX-ZR100
WG-30 | EX-ZR100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2014 | ![]() | July 2011 | More modern by 39 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Ricoh WG-30
EX-ZR100 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR100 features outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR100 versus the WG-30.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and WG-30 is 92 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes just by reading through a spec sheet. The pic below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR100 and WG-30.
As you can see, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-30 to give you extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR100 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2014-10-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 204g (0.45 lbs) | 192g (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $300 | $428 |