Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-80
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2022
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-70
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR100 was manufactured 11 years earlier than the WG-80 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR100 scores versus the WG-80 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Ricoh WG-80. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Ricoh WG-80
| EX-ZR100 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| WG-80 | EX-ZR100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2022 | July 2011 | Newer by 131 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Ricoh WG-80
| EX-ZR100 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR100 has external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Ricoh WG-80 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the WG-80.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and WG-80 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The image here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR100 and WG-80.
As you can tell, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-80 to provide more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR100 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.70 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204g (0.45 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $300 |