Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-M1
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively close and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR100 was launched 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR100 grades versus the WG-M1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-ZR100 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| WG-M1 | EX-ZR100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 38 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-ZR100 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR100 comes with outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR100 against the WG-M1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by researching specs. The photograph here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR100 and WG-M1.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older EX-ZR100 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204 grams (0.45 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $300 | $2,000 |
