Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL5
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL10
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Following is a extended review of the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung CL5, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the EX-ZR100 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR100 was unveiled 2 years after the CL5 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR100 grades versus the CL5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung CL5. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung CL5
| EX-ZR100 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 30 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| CL5 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung CL5
| EX-ZR100 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR100 has outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL5 has proportions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung CL5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR100 compared to the CL5.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and CL5 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR100 and CL5.
Clearly, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR100 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-ZR100 will give extra detail having an extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR100 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung CL5 |
| Alternative name | - | PL10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204g (0.45 pounds) | 141g (0.31 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $391 |