Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL80
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Other Name is ST5500
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung CL80, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is very comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR100 was launched 19 months later than the CL80 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR100 grades against the CL80 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung CL80. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung CL80
EX-ZR100 | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | January 2010 | More recent by 19 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Casio EX-ZR100
CL80 | EX-ZR100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.7" | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung CL80
EX-ZR100 | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR100 has exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung CL80 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung CL80 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR100 versus the CL80.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and CL80 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing technical specs. The graphic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR100 and CL80.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung CL80 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR100 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung CL80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung CL80 |
Otherwise known as | - | ST5500 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3.7" |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 204g (0.45 lbs) | 160g (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $400 |