Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung GX-1S
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39


68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung GX-1S, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the EX-ZR100 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

The EX-ZR100 was released 5 years after the GX-1S which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR100 grades against the GX-1S with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung GX-1S. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung GX-1S
EX-ZR100 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2006 | More modern by 67 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 210k | Crisper display (+251k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Casio EX-ZR100
GX-1S | EX-ZR100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung GX-1S
EX-ZR100 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR100 offers exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung GX-1S in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR100 against the GX-1S.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and GX-1S is 92 and 68 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The image here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR100 and GX-1S.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR100 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR100 will give you more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR100 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung GX-1S |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2006-01-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 6MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3008 x 2008 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 204g (0.45 lbs) | 605g (1.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $300 | $850 |