Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ10W
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Alternate Name is WB500
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung HZ10W, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the HZ10W (10MP) is very comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR100 was announced 2 years after the HZ10W which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-ZR100 grades versus the HZ10W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung HZ10W. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung HZ10W
EX-ZR100 | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | May 2009 | More modern by 27 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Casio EX-ZR100
HZ10W | EX-ZR100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung HZ10W
EX-ZR100 | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR100 has external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung HZ10W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung HZ10W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the HZ10W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and HZ10W is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The image here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR100 and HZ10W.
Plainly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR100 to show more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR100 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung HZ10W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung HZ10W |
Also Known as | - | WB500 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2432 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 204 gr (0.45 pounds) | 249 gr (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $300 |