Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ15W
Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
Portability
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
Samsung HZ15W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also Known as WB550
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ15W, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the HZ15W (12MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR100 was announced 2 years later than the HZ15W and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR100 matches up against the HZ15W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung HZ15W. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung HZ15W
| EX-ZR100 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Casio EX-ZR100
| HZ15W | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung HZ15W
| EX-ZR100 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR100 has external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung HZ15W has proportions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ15W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR100 against the HZ15W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and HZ15W is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The graphic below will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR100 and HZ15W.
All in all, both cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical MP so you can expect similar quality of photos but you might want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The younger EX-ZR100 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung HZ15W Portrait photography highlights
has manual focus
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
has manual focus
has face detect focusing
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Street photography highlights
Samsung HZ15W Street photography highlights
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (204g)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (249 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Sports photography factors
Samsung HZ15W Sports photography factors
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast shooting (40.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking autofocus
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Travel photography information
Samsung HZ15W Travel photography information
lighter than competition (204 grams)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low resolution sensor (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (249g)
low MP (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR100
Landscape photography with Samsung HZ15W
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung HZ15W as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (204 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic jack
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (249g)
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung HZ15W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung HZ15W |
| Also called as | - | WB550 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204 gr (0.45 lbs) | 249 gr (0.55 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $300 | $330 |