Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ35W
Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Also Known as WB650
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR100 was revealed 14 months later than the HZ35W making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR100 grades against the HZ35W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung HZ35W
| EX-ZR100 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Casio EX-ZR100
| HZ35W | EX-ZR100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung HZ35W
| EX-ZR100 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR100 has physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR100 versus the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and HZ35W is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and HZ35W.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of files although you may want to factor the age of the cameras into account. The newer EX-ZR100 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
focusing manually
comes with face detection focus
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR100
Street photography with Samsung HZ35W
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (204g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (245 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Sports photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography highlights
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast continuous shooting (40.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
excellent zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Travel photography features
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography features
lighter than others (204g)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse function
low megapixels (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition (245 grams)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (360mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Landscape photography factors
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography factors
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR100
Vlogging with Samsung HZ35W
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (204 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone support
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than competition (245 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called | - | WB650 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204 gr (0.45 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $300 | $300 |