Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX300
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Previous Model is Samsung NX210
- Replacement is Samsung NX500
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung NX300, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the EX-ZR100 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR100 was brought out 3 years before the NX300 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZR100 scores against the NX300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung NX300. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung NX300
EX-ZR100 | NX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Casio EX-ZR100
NX300 | EX-ZR100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2013 | July 2011 | Newer by 28 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 768k | 461k | Clearer display (+307k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung NX300
EX-ZR100 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR100 provides outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300 has measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung NX300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR100 against the NX300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and NX300 is 92 and 86 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching specifications. The image underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and NX300.
Plainly, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR100 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX300 will result in greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR100 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung NX300 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.3" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 768 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 204 gr (0.45 pounds) | 331 gr (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $750 |