Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX500
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
87 Imaging
67 Features
80 Overall
72
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 287g - 120 x 64 x 43mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Previous Model is Samsung NX300
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX500 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung NX500, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and NX500 (28MP) and the EX-ZR100 (1/2.3") and NX500 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR100 was launched 4 years prior to the NX500 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX500 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-ZR100 matches up against the NX500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX500 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung NX500. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung NX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung NX500
| EX-ZR100 | NX500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX500 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| NX500 | EX-ZR100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 | July 2011 | Newer by 43 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1036k | 461k | Sharper display (+575k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung NX500
| EX-ZR100 | NX500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR100 features exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung NX500 has proportions of 120mm x 64mm x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung NX500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR100 compared to the NX500.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and NX500 is 92 and 87 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by going over a spec sheet. The picture below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and NX500.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR100 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung NX500 will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 16MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR100 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX500 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX500 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung NX500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung NX500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2015-02-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | DRIMe 5 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 28 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6480 x 4320 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 209 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 1,036k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0fps | 9.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Smart flash, auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, fill w/redeye reduction, 1st-curtain, 2nd-curtain, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.265 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204 grams (0.45 lb) | 287 grams (0.63 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 120 x 64 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 87 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.9 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1379 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 370 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $300 | $800 |