Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL102
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL102, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is relatively similar and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR100 was revealed 2 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-ZR100 matches up versus the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-ZR100 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 31 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| SL102 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung SL102
| EX-ZR100 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR100 has got outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR100 and the SL102.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and SL102 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR100 and SL102.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR100 to offer you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR100 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204g (0.45 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $130 |
